<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>subtitles &#187; Uncategorized</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.noroute.de/blog/category/uncategorized/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.noroute.de/blog</link>
	<description>stating the obvious</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 09:12:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Android frustrations: &#8220;Enterprise features&#8221; are not just for the enterprise</title>
		<link>http://www.noroute.de/blog/2010/08/android-frustrations-enterprise-features-are-not-just-for-the-enterprise/</link>
		<comments>http://www.noroute.de/blog/2010/08/android-frustrations-enterprise-features-are-not-just-for-the-enterprise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 09:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Florian Thiel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noroute.de/blog/?p=299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s no Android device (that I know of) that supports hardware encryption of all data on the device, there&#8217;s no framework support for transparent encryption and there&#8217;s no remote wipe. These are the things commonly demanded for &#8220;enterprise devices&#8220;. But I&#8217;d like to have them on my Android phone as well, even when I don&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no Android device (that I know of) that supports hardware encryption of all data on the device, there&#8217;s no framework support for transparent encryption and there&#8217;s no remote wipe. These are the things commonly <a href="http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/android/thread?tid=5e3aa8551783f70e&amp;hl=en">demanded</a> for &#8220;<a href="http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/49560">enterprise devices</a>&#8220;.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;d like to have them on my Android phone as well, even when I don&#8217;t store company data on the device. People lose their phones. All the time. And there&#8217;s private data on there that should better be kept secret.</p>
<p>I feel uncomfortable carrying around a device which has more than 300 contact data sets, lots of personal email and also knows password to some of my accounts on the web. And I&#8217;d gladly buy an Android device that properly protects my data.</p>
<p><em>Oh, and no, all the apps available in the market that offer password stores or document encryption are <strong>just not the way to do it</strong>!</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.noroute.de/blog/2010/08/android-frustrations-enterprise-features-are-not-just-for-the-enterprise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Android Frustrations: Samsung Mail Client</title>
		<link>http://www.noroute.de/blog/2010/08/android-frustrations-samsung-mail-client/</link>
		<comments>http://www.noroute.de/blog/2010/08/android-frustrations-samsung-mail-client/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 11:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Florian Thiel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[english]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rechenmaschinen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sofware engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wahnsinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noroute.de/blog/?p=278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m under the impression that everybody who reviewed the Samsung Galaxy S I9000 and gave it big praise (even as an iPhone contender) has not really used the device for more than two minutes. There are so many annoyances and glitches that must not happen to well-designed user-friendly devices. The Samsung mail client Samsung has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m under the impression that everybody who reviewed the Samsung Galaxy S I9000 and gave it big praise (<a href="http://www.knowyourmobile.com/comparisons/517419/samsung_galaxy_s_vs_iphone_4.html">even</a> <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/200071/samsung_galaxy_vs_apple_iphone_business_features.html">as</a> an iPhone contender) has not really used the device for more than two minutes. There are so many annoyances and glitches that must not happen to well-designed user-friendly devices.</p>
<h2>The Samsung mail client</h2>
<p>Samsung has put their own email client with IMAP/POP3 support on the phone. And I&#8217;ve never used an email client with so many fundamental flaws:</p>
<ul>
<li>it considers all mail it has not read <strong>itself</strong> to be <strong>unread</strong> on IMAP. (Yes, IMAP!)</li>
<li>you cannot copy text from received emails (!!!)</li>
<li>it does not support threading</li>
<li>folders are shown as an <strong>horizontal</strong> bar at the top. This is not helpful if you have 50+ folders
<ul>
<li>oh, and you cannot move/copy mails to folders anyway</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>the &#8220;new mail&#8221; notification does not show subjects, only number of mails received</li>
<li>responding to mail does a fullquote and puts the text to the top; and no, there&#8217;s no way to do it another way</li>
</ul>
<p>And I forgot, it looks really ugly.</p>
<p>Fortunately there&#8217;s <a href="http://code.google.com/p/k9mail/">K9Mail</a> on the Android market that does most of these things better. But for an out-of-the-box experience (how many people exactly will be spending time looking for alternative clients) this is <strong>really</strong> bad. You can do better, Samsung.</p>
<div id="attachment_293" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 190px"><a href="http://www.noroute.de/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/mail.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-293 " title="Samsung Mail" src="http://www.noroute.de/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/mail-180x300.png" alt="" width="180" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Samsung&#39;s Mail app</p></div>
<div id="greasedLightboxError">
<p id="greasedLightboxErrorContext">
</div>
<p><img id="greasedLightboxPreload" alt="" /><img id="greasedLightboxPrefetch" alt="" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.noroute.de/blog/2010/08/android-frustrations-samsung-mail-client/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ausweitung der Zensurgesetzgebung</title>
		<link>http://www.noroute.de/blog/2009/04/ausweitung-der-zensurgesetzgebung/</link>
		<comments>http://www.noroute.de/blog/2009/04/ausweitung-der-zensurgesetzgebung/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 18:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Florian Thiel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.noroute.de/blog/?p=203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thomas Stadler vom Internet-Law Blog schreibt, dass die Beschlussvorlage für den neuen §8 TMG (das ist der Paragraph, der Internet-Filterung mittels Sperrlisten zum Gesetz macht) eine kleine aber zu allerlei bösen Hintergedanken anregende Änderung enthält: Es müssen jetzt alle Seiten, die sich in der Sperrliste finden, blockiert werden. Bisher war noch zusätzliche Voraussetzung, dass die [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas Stadler vom Internet-Law Blog <a href="http://www.internet-law.de/2009/04/update-gesetzesentwurf-zur-bekampfung.html">schreibt</a>, dass die Beschlussvorlage für den neuen §8 TMG (das ist der Paragraph, der Internet-Filterung mittels Sperrlisten zum Gesetz macht) eine kleine aber zu allerlei bösen Hintergedanken anregende Änderung enthält: Es müssen jetzt <strong>alle</strong> Seiten, die sich in der Sperrliste finden, blockiert werden. Bisher war noch zusätzliche Voraussetzung, dass die Seite tatsächlich Kinderpornographie beinhaltet.</p>
<p>Gleiches Muster wie immer, nur richtig plump. Versprechen, dass es ja &#8220;nur um Kinderpornographie&#8221; geht und dann Grundlagen schaffen, die eben nicht auf ebendies beschränkt sind.</p>
<p>Hat jemand eine Erklärung für diese Änderung, die nicht auf ein umfassendes Zensurvorhaben hinausläuft?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.noroute.de/blog/2009/04/ausweitung-der-zensurgesetzgebung/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
